Apple Microarchitecture Research by Dougall Johnson

M1/A14 P-core (Firestorm): Overview | Base Instructions | SIMD and FP Instructions
M1/A14 E-core (Icestorm):  Overview | Base Instructions | SIMD and FP Instructions

CMLE (zero, 16B)

Test 1: uops

Code:

  cmle v0.16b, v0.16b, #0
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2

(no loop instructions)

1000 unrolls and 1 iteration

Retires: 1.000

Issues: 1.000

Integer unit issues: 0.001

Load/store unit issues: 0.000

SIMD/FP unit issues: 1.000

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch simd uop (57)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map simd uop (7e)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000
1004203310011100010005024810001000100011000

Test 2: Latency 1->2

Code:

  cmle v0.16b, v0.16b, #0
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 2.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map ldst uop inputs (80)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? ldst retires (ed)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100062000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042040100884010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100
102042003310101101100001001000030050924810100200100042000100041010000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 2.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100042010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010046111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010
10025200661002921100082010034705092481002020100002010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010
10024200331002121100002010000705092481002020100002010000111000010

Test 3: throughput

Count: 8

Code:

  cmle v0.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v1.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v2.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v3.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v4.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v5.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v6.16b, v8.16b, #0
  cmle v7.16b, v8.16b, #0
  movi v8.16b, 9

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5004

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
8020440066801071018000610080010300320036801082008001220080012180000100
8020440044801051018000410080008300320036801082008001220080012180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320036801082008001220080012180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320036801082008001220080012180000100
8020440328803001018019910080203300320036801082008001220080012180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320236801582008006220080012180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320396802012008011120080012180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320036801082008001220080064180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320036801082008001220080062180000100
8020440034801051018000410080008300320036801082008001220080012180000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5004

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
80024401058002721800062080010693208008021920802052080256118000010
80024402758017221801512080155703200528003220800182080018118000010
80024400358002921800082080012703200528003220800182080018118000010
80024400358002921800082080012703200528003220800182080018118000010
80024400358002921800082080012703200528003220800182080018118000010
80024400358002921800082080012703200528003220800182080018118000010
80024400358002921800082080012703200528003220800182080018118000010
80024400358002921800082080012703202448008020800662080018118000010
80024400348002121800002080000703200008002020800002080000118000010
80024400348002121800002080000653205888016720801472080095118000010