Apple Microarchitecture Research by Dougall Johnson

M1/A14 P-core (Firestorm): Overview | Base Instructions | SIMD and FP Instructions
M1/A14 E-core (Icestorm):  Overview | Base Instructions | SIMD and FP Instructions

FMLAL2 (by element, 4S)

Test 1: uops

Code:

  fmlal2 v0.4s, v1.4h, v2.h[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2
  movi v2.16b, 3

(no loop instructions)

1000 unrolls and 1 iteration

Retires: 1.000

Issues: 1.000

Integer unit issues: 0.001

Load/store unit issues: 0.000

SIMD/FP unit issues: 1.000

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch simd uop (57)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map simd uop (7e)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000
10044033100111000100010155710001000300011000

Test 2: Latency 1->1

Code:

  fmlal2 v0.4s, v1.4h, v2.h[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2
  movi v2.16b, 3

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 4.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028904101302001004420030012110000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 4.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100042030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030132111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010

Test 3: Latency 1->2

Code:

  fmlal2 v0.4s, v0.4h, v1.h[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 4.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000620030018110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100003001028557101002001000420030012110000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 4.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100007010285571002020100002030000111000010

Test 4: Latency 1->3

Code:

  fmlal2 v0.4s, v1.4h, v0.h[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 4.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)dispatch ldst uop (58)int uops in schedulers (59)simd uops in schedulers (5a)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map ldst uop (7d)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000620030018110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100
10204400331010110110000100100000300010285571010020001000420030012110000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 4.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)dispatch ldst uop (58)int uops in schedulers (59)simd uops in schedulers (5a)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map ldst uop (7d)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002230459121000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030000111000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030000111000010
100254006610025211000420100300700102855710020200100002030129111000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030120111000010
100244003310021211000020100000700102855710020200100002030000111000010
100254006610025211000420100300700102855710020200100002030000111000010

Test 5: throughput

Count: 8

Code:

  movi v0.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v0.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v1.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v1.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v2.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v2.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v3.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v3.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v4.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v4.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v5.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v5.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v6.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v6.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v7.16b, 0
  fmlal2 v7.4s, v8.4h, v9.h[1]
  movi v8.16b, 9
  movi v9.16b, 10

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5011

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
1602044049580109101800081008001230032005680113200800132002400391160000100
1602044010580109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044009680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001230032005280112200800122002400361160000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5054

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
1600244382680020118000910800133032005680023208001320240000116000010
1600244122080011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244036180011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244039580011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244042880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244042880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240039116000010
1600244054580020118000910800133032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244044480011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244042280011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244043980011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010

Test 6: throughput

Count: 12

Code:

  fmlal2 v0.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v1.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v2.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v3.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v4.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v5.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v6.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v7.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v8.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v9.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v10.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  fmlal2 v11.4s, v12.4h, v13.h[1]
  movi v12.16b, 13
  movi v13.16b, 14

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5003

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
120204600771201051011200041001200083004800441201102001200142003600391120000100
120204600361201071011200061001200103004800361201082001200122003601921120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600361201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5003

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map ldst uop inputs (80)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? ldst retires (ed)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
12002460095120016111200051012000930480044120020201200142003600421012000010
12002560079120056111200451012005730480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480048120021201200142003600421012000010
12002460045120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010
12002460036120011111200001012000030480000120010201200002003600001012000010