Apple Microarchitecture Research by Dougall Johnson

M1/A14 P-core (Firestorm): Overview | Base Instructions | SIMD and FP Instructions
M1/A14 E-core (Icestorm):  Overview | Base Instructions | SIMD and FP Instructions

SMLSL2 (by element, 2D)

Test 1: uops

Code:

  smlsl2 v0.2d, v1.4s, v2.s[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2
  movi v2.16b, 3

(no loop instructions)

1000 unrolls and 1 iteration

Retires: 1.000

Issues: 1.000

Integer unit issues: 0.001

Load/store unit issues: 0.000

SIMD/FP unit issues: 1.000

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch simd uop (57)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map simd uop (7e)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000
1004303310011100010007590510001000300011000

Test 2: Latency 1->1

Code:

  smlsl2 v0.2d, v1.4s, v2.s[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2
  movi v2.16b, 3

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 3.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map ldst uop inputs (80)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? ldst retires (ed)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 3.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100042030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010

Test 3: Latency 1->2

Code:

  smlsl2 v0.2d, v0.4s, v1.s[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 3.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map ldst uop inputs (80)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? ldst retires (ed)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100062000300181010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076924710131200100442000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100062000300181010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000030076890510100200100042000300121010000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 3.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030144111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010

Test 4: Latency 1->3

Code:

  smlsl2 v0.2d, v1.4s, v0.s[1]
  movi v0.16b, 1
  movi v1.16b, 2

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 3.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)dispatch ldst uop (58)int uops in schedulers (59)simd uops in schedulers (5a)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map ldst uop (7d)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map ldst uop inputs (80)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? ldst retires (ed)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100062000300181010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300181010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100062000300121010000100
102043003310101101100001001000003000768905101002000100042000300121010000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code): 3.0033

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010
10024300331002121100002010000707689051002020100002030000111000010

Test 5: throughput

Count: 8

Code:

  movi v0.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v0.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v1.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v1.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v2.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v2.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v3.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v3.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v4.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v4.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v5.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v5.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v6.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v6.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v7.16b, 0
  smlsl2 v7.2d, v8.4s, v9.s[1]
  movi v8.16b, 9
  movi v9.16b, 10

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5011

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)dispatch ldst uop (58)int uops in schedulers (59)simd uops in schedulers (5a)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map ldst uop (7d)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
1602044049280109101800081008001203000320056801132000800132002400391160000100
1602044010780109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100
1602044008680109101800081008001203000320052801122000800122002400361160000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5053

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
1600244382080019118000810800123032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244121180011118000010800003032019680058208004820240000116000010
1600244040780011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244041880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244041880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244041880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244041880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244041880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244041880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010
1600244043880011118000010800003032000080010208000020240000116000010

Test 6: throughput

Count: 12

Code:

  smlsl2 v0.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v1.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v2.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v3.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v4.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v5.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v6.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v7.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v8.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v9.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v10.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  smlsl2 v11.2d, v12.4s, v13.s[1]
  movi v12.16b, 13
  movi v13.16b, 14

(fused SUBS/B.cc loop)

100 unrolls and 100 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5003

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
120204601061201051011200041001200083004800441201102001200142003600421120000100
120204600351201071011200061001200103004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201071011200061001200103004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120205600711201421011200411001200533004800361201082001200122003600361120000100
120204600351201051011200041001200083004800361201082001200122003600361120000100

1000 unrolls and 10 iterations

Result (median cycles for code divided by count): 0.5003

retire uop (01)cycle (02)schedule uop (52)schedule int uop (53)schedule simd uop (54)dispatch int uop (56)dispatch simd uop (57)int uops in schedulers (59)ldst uops in schedulers (5b)dispatch uop (78)map int uop (7c)map simd uop (7e)map int uop inputs (7f)map simd uop inputs (81)? int output thing (e9)? simd retires (ee)? int retires (ef)
120024600951200171112000610120010304800441200202012001420360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120025600701200551112004410120056304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010
120024600351200111112000010120000304800001200102012000020360000112000010